↓ Skip to main content

HARMFUL DRINKING IN MILITARY VETERANS WITH POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER: ASSOCIATION WITH THE D2 DOPAMINE RECEPTOR A1 ALLELE

Overview of attention for article published in Alcohol & Alcoholism, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
HARMFUL DRINKING IN MILITARY VETERANS WITH POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER: ASSOCIATION WITH THE D2 DOPAMINE RECEPTOR A1 ALLELE
Published in
Alcohol & Alcoholism, September 2002
DOI 10.1093/alcalc/37.5.451
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The frequency of the Taq I A alleles (A1 and A2) of the D2 dopamine receptor (DRD2) gene was examined in Caucasian post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients and controls. In 91 PTSD patients, the frequency of the A1 allele was higher (P = 6.12 x 10(-3)) than in the 51 controls. In the 38 PTSD harmful drinkers (>or=60 g alcohol/day), A1 allelic frequency was higher (P = 3.91 x 10(-2)) than in the 53 non-harmful drinkers (<60 g alcohol/day), the former being also higher (P = 3.76 x 10(-4)) than in controls. However, there was no difference between non-harmful drinkers and controls. Based on DRD2 allelic association, the 35 PTSD patients with the A1(+) (A1A1, A1A2) allele consumed more than twice the daily amount of alcohol than the 56 patients with the A1(-) (A2A2) allele (P = 1.94 x 10(-3)). When the hourly rate of alcohol consumed was compared, A1(+) allelic patients consumed twice the rate of the A1(-) allelic patients (P < 10(-7)). The DRD2 A1 allele was associated with PTSD. However, this association was found only in the harmful drinkers. PTSD patients with the A1(+) allele consumed more alcohol than patients with the A1(-) allele. The importance of determining alcohol consumption in DRD2 association studies with PTSD is suggested.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#12,344,996
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Alcohol & Alcoholism
#1,016
of 2,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,956
of 73,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alcohol & Alcoholism
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.