↓ Skip to main content

Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance.

Overview of attention for article published in Radiology, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
42 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
137 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance.
Published in
Radiology, May 2023
DOI 10.1148/radiol.222176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Dratsch, Xue Chen, Mohammad Rezazade Mehrizi, Roman Kloeckner, Aline Mähringer-Kunz, Michael Püsken, Bettina Baeßler, Stephanie Sauer, David Maintz, Daniel Pinto Dos Santos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 29 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Computer Science 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Philosophy 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 27 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 396. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#77,850
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Radiology
#117
of 10,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,022
of 409,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiology
#9
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.