↓ Skip to main content

Direct Exchange Mechanism for Interlayer Ions in Non-Swelling Clays

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Direct Exchange Mechanism for Interlayer Ions in Non-Swelling Clays
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, December 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.6b04747
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The mobility of radiocesium in the environment is largely mediated by cation exchange in micaceous clays, in particular Illite-a non-swelling clay mineral that naturally contains interlayer K(+) and has high affinity for Cs(+). Although exchange of interlayer K(+) for Cs(+) is nearly thermodynamically nonselective, recent experiments show that direct, anhydrous Cs(+)-K(+) exchange is kinetically viable and leads to the formation of phase-separated interlayers through a mechanism that remains unclear. Here, using classical atomistic simulations and density functional theory calculations, we identify a molecular-scale positive feedback mechanism in which exchange of the larger Cs(+) for the smaller K(+) significantly lowers the migration barrier of neighboring K(+), allowing exchange to propagate rapidly once initiated at the clay edge. Barrier lowering upon slight increase in layer spacing (∼0.7 Å) during Cs(+) exchange is an example of "chemical-mechanical coupling" that likely explains the observed sharp exchange fronts leading to interstratification. Interestingly, we find that these features are thermodynamically favored even in the absence of a heterogeneous layer charge distribution.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 18%
Chemical Engineering 5 11%
Chemistry 5 11%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 15 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2016.
All research outputs
#24,639,802
of 27,376,552 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#20,980
of 22,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#362,231
of 420,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#233
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,376,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.