↓ Skip to main content

A Landscape “Difficult to Describe”: The Model Village and the Capital City

Overview of attention for article published in Architectural Theory Review, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Landscape “Difficult to Describe”: The Model Village and the Capital City
Published in
Architectural Theory Review, April 2023
DOI 10.1080/13264826.2023.2195672
Authors

Phoebe Springstubb

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 29%
Unspecified 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,706,060
of 24,569,575 outputs
Outputs from Architectural Theory Review
#62
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,680
of 402,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Architectural Theory Review
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,569,575 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.