↓ Skip to main content

Emergence of multiple genotypes of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in Hong Kong SAR

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
patent
11 patents
reddit
2 Redditors
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Emergence of multiple genotypes of H5N1 avian influenza viruses in Hong Kong SAR
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2002
DOI 10.1073/pnas.132268999
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 117 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 23%
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Professor 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 17 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2024.
All research outputs
#2,100,715
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#25,670
of 118,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,363
of 69,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#54
of 601 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 601 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.