You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Academic Journals, Incentives, and the Quality of Peer Review: A Model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Philosophy of Science, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.1017/psa.2023.81 |
Authors |
Kevin J. S. Zollman, Julian García, Toby Handfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 13% |
Germany | 4 | 6% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | 3% |
Hungary | 1 | 1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
Central African Republic | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 28 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 39 | 54% |
Scientists | 29 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 100% |