↓ Skip to main content

Oral Bisphosphonate-Induced Osteonecrosis: Risk Factors, Prediction of Risk Using Serum CTX Testing, Prevention, and Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (02782391), December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
guideline
5 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
426 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Oral Bisphosphonate-Induced Osteonecrosis: Risk Factors, Prediction of Risk Using Serum CTX Testing, Prevention, and Treatment
Published in
Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (02782391), December 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 413 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 13%
Student > Postgraduate 45 11%
Student > Bachelor 44 10%
Other 38 9%
Researcher 31 7%
Other 95 22%
Unknown 117 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 241 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 1%
Engineering 4 <1%
Other 26 6%
Unknown 126 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,783,993
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (02782391)
#85
of 3,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,485
of 226,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (02782391)
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.