↓ Skip to main content

IMPROVING INFERENCES IN POPULATION STUDIES OF RARE SPECIES THAT ARE DETECTED IMPERFECTLY

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
791 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IMPROVING INFERENCES IN POPULATION STUDIES OF RARE SPECIES THAT ARE DETECTED IMPERFECTLY
Published in
Ecology, May 2005
DOI 10.1890/04-1060
Authors

Darryl I. MacKenzie, James. D. Nichols, Nicole Sutton, Kae Kawanishi, Larissa L. Bailey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 791 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 23 3%
Brazil 10 1%
Canada 7 <1%
France 6 <1%
India 6 <1%
Chile 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Bulgaria 2 <1%
Other 21 3%
Unknown 706 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 207 26%
Student > Master 150 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 141 18%
Other 46 6%
Student > Bachelor 38 5%
Other 122 15%
Unknown 87 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 460 58%
Environmental Science 179 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 1%
Mathematics 7 <1%
Other 20 3%
Unknown 103 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,392,214
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#2,826
of 6,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,101
of 58,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.