↓ Skip to main content

The 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Criteria for Infective Endocarditis: Updating the Modified Duke Criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
twitter
915 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Criteria for Infective Endocarditis: Updating the Modified Duke Criteria
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, May 2023
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciad271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vance G Fowler, David T Durack, Christine Selton-Suty, Eugene Athan, Arnold S Bayer, Anna Lisa Chamis, Anders Dahl, Louis DiBernardo, Emanuele Durante-Mangoni, Xavier Duval, Claudio Querido Fortes, Emil Fosbøl, Margaret M Hannan, Barbara Hasse, Bruno Hoen, Adolf W Karchmer, Carlos A Mestres, Cathy A Petti, María Nazarena Pizzi, Stephen D Preston, Albert Roque, Francois Vandenesch, Jan T M van der Meer, Thomas W van der Vaart, Jose M Miro

Abstract

The microbiology, epidemiology, diagnostics, and treatment of infective endocarditis (IE) have changed significantly since the Duke Criteria were published in 1994 and modified in 2000. The International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) convened a multidisciplinary Working Group to update the diagnostic criteria for IE. The resulting 2023 Duke-ISCVID IE Criteria propose significant changes, including new microbiology diagnostics (enzyme immunoassay for Bartonella species, PCR, amplicon/metagenomic sequencing, in situ hybridization), imaging ([18F]FDG PET/CT, Cardiac Computed Tomography), and inclusion of intraoperative inspection as a new Major Clinical Criterion. The list of "typical" microorganisms causing IE was expanded and includes pathogens to be considered as typical only in the presence of intracardiac prostheses. The requirements for timing and separate venipunctures for blood cultures were removed. Last, additional predisposing conditions (transcatheter valve implants, endovascular cardiac implantable electronic devices, prior IE) were clarified. These diagnostic criteria should be updated periodically by making the ISCVID-Duke Criteria available online as a "Living Document".

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 915 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Unspecified 17 10%
Other 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 65 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 37%
Unspecified 19 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 65 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 853. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#21,599
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#75
of 16,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#636
of 410,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#1
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.