You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Glutamate indicators with improved activation kinetics and localization for imaging synaptic transmission
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Methods, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41592-023-01863-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Abhi Aggarwal, Rui Liu, Yang Chen, Amelia J. Ralowicz, Samuel J. Bergerson, Filip Tomaska, Boaz Mohar, Timothy L. Hanson, Jeremy P. Hasseman, Daniel Reep, Getahun Tsegaye, Pantong Yao, Xiang Ji, Marinus Kloos, Deepika Walpita, Ronak Patel, Manuel A. Mohr, Paul W. Tillberg, Loren L. Looger, Jonathan S. Marvin, Michael B. Hoppa, Arthur Konnerth, David Kleinfeld, Eric R. Schreiter, Kaspar Podgorski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 867 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 169 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 28 | 3% |
Germany | 25 | 3% |
Canada | 18 | 2% |
France | 18 | 2% |
Bangladesh | 18 | 2% |
Japan | 12 | 1% |
Pakistan | 12 | 1% |
Australia | 9 | 1% |
Other | 93 | 11% |
Unknown | 465 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 639 | 74% |
Scientists | 208 | 24% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 169 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 12% |
Unknown | 59 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 56 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 10% |
Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Unknown | 62 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 445. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#64,012
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#27
of 5,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,730
of 410,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#1
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.