You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engineered phage with antibacterial CRISPR–Cas selectively reduce E. coli burden in mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41587-023-01759-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yilmaz Emre Gencay, Džiuginta Jasinskytė, Camille Robert, Szabolcs Semsey, Virginia Martínez, Anders Østergaard Petersen, Katja Brunner, Ana de Santiago Torio, Alex Salazar, Iszabela Cristiana Turcu, Melissa Kviesgaard Eriksen, Lev Koval, Adam Takos, Ricardo Pascal, Thea Staffeldt Schou, Lone Bayer, Tina Bryde, Katja Chandelle Johansen, Emilie Glad Bak, Frenk Smrekar, Timothy B. Doyle, Michael J. Satlin, Aurelie Gram, Joana Carvalho, Lene Jessen, Björn Hallström, Jonas Hink, Birgitte Damholt, Alice Troy, Mette Grove, Jasper Clube, Christian Grøndahl, Jakob Krause Haaber, Eric van der Helm, Milan Zdravkovic, Morten Otto Alexander Sommer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 259 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 6% |
| Spain | 7 | 3% |
| Denmark | 7 | 3% |
| Mexico | 6 | 2% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Kenya | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 122 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 175 | 68% |
| Scientists | 70 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 55 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 22% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 65 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 688. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#31,178
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#57
of 8,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#862
of 411,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#2
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.