↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
4 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dendritic Cell Vaccination Enhances Immune Responses and Induces Regression of HER2pos DCIS Independent of Route: Results of Randomized Selection Design Trial
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, June 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-1924
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Vaccination with HER2 peptide-pulsed DC1s stimulates a HER2 specific T-cell response. This randomized trial aimed to establish safety and evaluate immune and clinical responses to vaccination via intralesional (IL), intranodal (IN), or both intralesional and intranodal (ILN) injection. Fifty-four HER2(pos) patients (42 pure DCIS, 12 early invasive breast cancer (IBC)) were enrolled in a neoadjuvant HER2 peptide-pulsed DC1 vaccine trial. Patients were randomized to IL (n=19), IN (n=19), or ILN (n=16) injection. Immune responses were measured in peripheral blood and sentinel lymph nodes by ELISPOT or in-vitro sensitization assay. Pathologic response was assessed in resected surgical specimens. Vaccination by all injection routes was well-tolerated. There was no significant difference in immune response rates by vaccination route (IL 84.2% vs. IN 89.5% vs. ILN 66.7%; p=0.30). The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was higher in DCIS patients compared with IBC patients (28.6% vs. 8.3%). DCIS patients who achieved pCR (n=12) and who did not achieve pCR (n=30) had similar peripheral blood anti-HER2 immune responses. All patients who achieved pCR had an anti-HER2 CD4 immune response in the sentinel lymph node and the quantified response was higher by response repertoire (p=0.03) and cumulative response (p=0.04). Anti-HER2 DC1 vaccination is a safe and immunogenic treatment to induce tumor-specific T-cell responses in HER2(pos) patients; immune and clinical responses were similar independent of vaccination route. The immune response in the sentinel lymph nodes, rather than in the peripheral blood, may serve as an endpoint more reflective of anti-tumor activity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 95 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 30 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2025.
All research outputs
#287,811
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#120
of 17,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,780
of 366,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#3
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.