You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conserving Inland Cutthroat Trout in Small Streams: How Much Stream is Enough?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
North American Journal of Fisheries Management, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<0513:cictis>2.3.co;2 |
| Authors |
Robert H. Hilderbrand, Jeffrey L. Kershner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 25% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 40% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from North American Journal of Fisheries Management
#352
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,206
of 191,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from North American Journal of Fisheries Management
#96
of 456 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 456 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.