You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Much Is Enough? The Recurrent Problem of Setting Measurable Objectives in Conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AIBS Bulletin, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0835:hmietr]2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
Timothy H. Tear, Peter Kareiva, Paul L. Angermeier, Patrick Comer, Brian Czech, Randy Kautz, Laura Landon, David Mehlman, Karen Murphy, Mary Ruckelshaus, J. Michael Scott, George Wilhere |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 572 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 4% |
| Brazil | 13 | 2% |
| Australia | 6 | 1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 507 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 152 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 95 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 90 | 16% |
| Other | 52 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 9% |
| Other | 90 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 248 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 213 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 22 | 4% |
| Unknown | 63 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,106,739
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from AIBS Bulletin
#67
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,498
of 70,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIBS Bulletin
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.