↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cobalt Nanoparticle‐Embedded Porous Carbon Nanofibers with Inherent N‐ and F‐Doping as Binder‐Free Bifunctional Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction and Evolution Reactions
Published in
ChemPhysChem, December 2016
DOI 10.1002/cphc.201600771
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Efficient, low cost, non-precious metal based, and stable bifunctional electrocatalysts are key to various energy storage and conversion devices such as regenerative fuel cells and metal-air batteries. In this work, we report cobalt nanoparticle-embedded porous carbon nanofibers with inherent N- and F- doping as binder-free bifunctional electrocatalysts with excellent activity for both oxygen reduction and evolution reactions (ORR/OER) in alkaline medium. Single-step electrospinning of a solution of selected polymer mixture (carbon precursor) and the cobalt precursor followed by controlled pyrolysis with an intermediate reduction step in H2 (to reduce cobalt oxides to cobalt) was utilized to synthesize an integrated freestanding catalyst. The fabricated catalyst with effective structural and electronic interaction between the cobalt metal nanoparticles and the N- and F-doped carbon defect sites showed enhanced catalytic properties compared to the benchmark catalysts for ORR and OER (Pt, Ir, and Ru). The ORR potential at the current density of -3 mA cm-2 was 0.81 VRHE and the OER potential at a current density of 10 mA cm-2 was 1.595 VRHE, resulting in a ∆E of only 0.785V.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Researcher 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 5 23%
Chemistry 3 14%
Materials Science 3 14%
Engineering 2 9%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2025.
All research outputs
#5,959,806
of 28,465,124 outputs
Outputs from ChemPhysChem
#491
of 5,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,481
of 422,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemPhysChem
#4
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,465,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,902 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.