↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Proprioceptive accuracy in women with early and established knee osteoarthritis and its relation to functional ability, postural control, and muscle strength
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10067-013-2285-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify differences in knee proprioceptive accuracy between subjects with early knee osteoarthritis (OA), established knee OA, and healthy controls. Furthermore, the relation between proprioceptive accuracy on the one hand and functional ability, postural balance, and muscle strength on the other hand was also explored. New MRI-based classification criteria showing evidence of beginning joint degeneration have been used to identify subjects with early knee OA. A total of 45 women with knee OA (early OA, n = 21; established OA, n = 24) and 20 healthy female control subjects participated in the study. Proprioceptive accuracy was evaluated using the repositioning error of a knee joint position sense test using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Subjective and objective functional ability was assessed by the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score, the timed "Up & Go" test, and the stair climbing test. The sensory organization test measured postural control. Muscle strength was measured by isokinetic dynamometry. Early OA subjects showed no significant differences in proprioceptive accuracy compared to healthy controls. In contrast, established OA subjects showed a higher repositioning error compared to early OA subjects (+29 %, P = 0.033) and healthy controls (+25 %, P = 0.068). Proprioceptive accuracy was not significantly associated with functional ability, postural balance, and muscle strength. Knee joint proprioceptive deficits were observed in established OA but not in early OA, suggesting that impaired proprioception is most likely a consequence of structural degeneration, rather than a risk factor in the pathogenesis of knee OA. Impaired proprioceptive accuracy was not associated with disease-related functionality in knee OA patients. Treatment strategies designed to address proprioceptive deficits may be not effective in prevention of knee OA progression and may have no impact on patients' functionality. However, this should be confirmed further in well-designed clinical trials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 179 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 58 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 14%
Sports and Recreations 17 9%
Engineering 8 4%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 76 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2013.
All research outputs
#13,384,762
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#1,646
of 2,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,741
of 194,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#21
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.