↓ Skip to main content

Velocity, Oxygen Uptake, and Metabolic Cost of Pull, Kick, and Whole-Body Swimming.

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Velocity, Oxygen Uptake, and Metabolic Cost of Pull, Kick, and Whole-Body Swimming.
Published in
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, December 2016
DOI 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0322
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The contributions of the limbs to velocity and metabolic parameters in front-crawl swimming at different intensities have not been identified with the consideration of both stroke and kick rate. Consequently, velocity, oxygen uptake (V̇O2) and metabolic cost of swimming with the whole body (swim), the upper-limbs only (pull) and lower-limbs only (kick) were compared with stroke and kick rate controlled. Twenty elite swimmers completed six 200m trials; two swim, two pull and two kick. Swim trials were guided by underwater lights at paces equivalent to 65±3% and 78±3% of participants' 200m freestyle personal best pace; paces were described as 'low' and 'moderate', respectively. In the pull and kick trials, swimmers aimed to match the stroke and kick rates recorded during the swim trials, respectively. V̇O2 was measured continuously, with velocity and metabolic cost calculated for each 200m effort. The velocity contribution of the upper-limbs (mean±SD: low 63.9±6.2%; moderate 59.6±4.2%) was greater than that of the lower-limbs to a large extent at both intensities (low ES=4.40; moderate ES=4.60). The V̇O2 utilized by the upper-limbs differed between the intensities (low 55.5±6.9%; moderate 51.4±4.0%; ES=0.74). The lower-limbs were responsible for a greater percentage of the metabolic cost compared to the upper-limbs at both intensities (low 56.1±9.5%, ES=1.30; moderate 55.1±6.6%, ES=1.55). Implementation of this testing protocol before and after a pull or kick training block will enable sports scientists to identify how the velocity contributions and/or metabolic cost of the upper- and lower-limb actions have responded to the training program.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 14 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 17 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#10,119,562
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
#1,411
of 2,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,809
of 458,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
#35
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.