↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing Neurosurgical Education in Low- and Middle-income Countries: Current Methods and New Advances

Overview of attention for article published in Neurologia medico chirurgica, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 541)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing Neurosurgical Education in Low- and Middle-income Countries: Current Methods and New Advances
Published in
Neurologia medico chirurgica, September 2016
DOI 10.2176/nmc.ra.2016-0092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin E LIANG, Ilia BERNSTEIN, KATO Yoko, Takeshi KAWASE, Mojgan HODAIE

Abstract

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face a critical shortage of basic surgical services. Adequate neurosurgical services can have a far-reaching positive impact on society's health care and, consequently, the economic development in LMICs. Yet surgery, and specifically neurosurgery has been a long neglected sector of global health. This article reviews the current efforts to enhance neurosurgery education in LMICs and outlines ongoing approaches for improvement. In addition, we introduce the concept of a sustainable and cost-effective model to enhance neurosurgical resources in LMICs and describe the process and methods of online curriculum development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 26 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 33%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 29 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,684,643
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Neurologia medico chirurgica
#23
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,578
of 344,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurologia medico chirurgica
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.