↓ Skip to main content

Which is a Preferable Technique for Patients Receiving General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section, Total Intravenous or Inhaled Anesthesia?

Overview of attention for article published in THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which is a Preferable Technique for Patients Receiving General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section, Total Intravenous or Inhaled Anesthesia?
Published in
THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, January 2015
DOI 10.2199/jjsca.35.468
Authors

Hidetomo NIWA, Futoshi KIMURA, Kazuyoshi HIROTA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
#148
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,474
of 362,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.