↓ Skip to main content

Retinal Vessel Caliber and Lifelong Neuropsychological Functioning

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
12 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Retinal Vessel Caliber and Lifelong Neuropsychological Functioning
Published in
Psychological Science, May 2013
DOI 10.1177/0956797612470959
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Why do more intelligent people live healthier and longer lives? One possibility is that intelligence tests assess health of the brain, but psychological science has lacked technology to evaluate this hypothesis. Digital retinal imaging, a new, noninvasive method to visualize microcirculation in the eye, may reflect vascular conditions in the brain. We studied the association between retinal vessel caliber and neuropsychological functioning in the representative Dunedin birth cohort. Wider venular caliber was associated with poorer neuropsychological functioning at midlife, independently of potentially confounding factors. This association was not limited to any specific test domain and extended to informants' reports of cohort members' cognitive difficulties in everyday life. Moreover, wider venular caliber was associated with lower childhood IQ tested 25 years earlier. The findings indicate that retinal venular caliber may be an indicator of neuropsychological health years before the onset of dementing diseases and suggest that digital retinal imaging may be a useful investigative tool for psychological science.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 105 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Other 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Professor 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 27 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#697,491
of 32,583,832 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#1,202
of 4,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,233
of 231,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#30
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,583,832 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.