You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence-Based Guideline for the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Rheumatology, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41584-023-00958-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giacomo Emmi, Alessandra Bettiol, Elena Gelain, Ingeborg M. Bajema, Alvise Berti, Stella Burns, Maria C. Cid, Jan W. Cohen Tervaert, Vincent Cottin, Eugenia Durante, Julia U. Holle, Alfred D. Mahr, Marcos Martinez Del Pero, Chiara Marvisi, John Mills, Sergey Moiseev, Frank Moosig, Chetan Mukhtyar, Thomas Neumann, Iacopo Olivotto, Carlo Salvarani, Benjamin Seeliger, Renato A. Sinico, Camille Taillé, Benjamin Terrier, Nils Venhoff, George Bertsias, Loïc Guillevin, David R. W. Jayne, Augusto Vaglio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 214 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 21 | 10% |
| Spain | 15 | 7% |
| Colombia | 9 | 4% |
| India | 8 | 4% |
| Japan | 7 | 3% |
| France | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 102 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 173 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 9% |
| Scientists | 17 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 31 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 35% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#279,729
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Rheumatology
#21
of 2,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,490
of 405,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Rheumatology
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.