You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Personalized RNA neoantigen vaccines stimulate T cells in pancreatic cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-023-06063-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis A. Rojas, Zachary Sethna, Kevin C. Soares, Cristina Olcese, Nan Pang, Erin Patterson, Jayon Lihm, Nicholas Ceglia, Pablo Guasp, Alexander Chu, Rebecca Yu, Adrienne Kaya Chandra, Theresa Waters, Jennifer Ruan, Masataka Amisaki, Abderezak Zebboudj, Zagaa Odgerel, George Payne, Evelyna Derhovanessian, Felicitas Müller, Ina Rhee, Mahesh Yadav, Anton Dobrin, Michel Sadelain, Marta Łuksza, Noah Cohen, Laura Tang, Olca Basturk, Mithat Gönen, Seth Katz, Richard Kinh Do, Andrew S. Epstein, Parisa Momtaz, Wungki Park, Ryan Sugarman, Anna M. Varghese, Elizabeth Won, Avni Desai, Alice C. Wei, Michael I. D’Angelica, T. Peter Kingham, Ira Mellman, Taha Merghoub, Jedd D. Wolchok, Ugur Sahin, Özlem Türeci, Benjamin D. Greenbaum, William R. Jarnagin, Jeffrey Drebin, Eileen M. O’Reilly, Vinod P. Balachandran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,754 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 376 | 10% |
| Spain | 190 | 5% |
| Mexico | 181 | 5% |
| Japan | 176 | 5% |
| Germany | 111 | 3% |
| France | 72 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 65 | 2% |
| Peru | 62 | 2% |
| Argentina | 60 | 2% |
| Other | 444 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2017 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3156 | 84% |
| Scientists | 430 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 133 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 35 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 570 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 570 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 99 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 12% |
| Other | 38 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 93 | 16% |
| Unknown | 206 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 103 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 58 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 68 | 12% |
| Unknown | 220 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3816. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,374
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#133
of 98,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32
of 404,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#5
of 1,082 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,082 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.