You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Science across the Meiji divide: Vernacular literary genres as vectors of science in modern Japan.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
History of Science, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1177/00732753231170413 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruselle Meade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 78% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,507,086
of 25,492,047 outputs
Outputs from History of Science
#12
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,318
of 401,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from History of Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,492,047 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them