You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A neurocognitive theory of flexible emotion control: The role of the lateral frontal pole in emotion regulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nyas.15003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karin Roelofs, Bob Bramson, Ivan Toni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 7 | 9% |
| United States | 6 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 70% |
| Scientists | 19 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 23% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 4 | 18% |
| Psychology | 4 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#869,282
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#264
of 11,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,370
of 404,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.