You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Choosing the Right Tool for the Job: Screening Tools for Systematic Reviews in Education
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.1080/19345747.2023.2209079 |
Authors |
Qiyang Zhang, Amanda Neitzel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 23% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
Spain | 2 | 6% |
Honduras | 1 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Peru | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Philippines | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 57% |
Scientists | 11 | 31% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 8 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Researcher | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 8 | 33% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,645,424
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
#29
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,843
of 402,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.