You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In critique of moral resilience: UK healthcare professionals’ experiences working with asylum applicants housed in contingency accommodation during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.1136/jme-2022-108632 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Louise Tomkow, Gabrielle Prager, Kitty Worthing, Rebecca Farrington |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,930,320
of 24,630,122 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1,643
of 3,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,994
of 382,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#28
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,630,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.