↓ Skip to main content

Telescoping of caregiver report on the Autism Diagnostic Interview – Revised

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Telescoping of caregiver report on the Autism Diagnostic Interview – Revised
Published in
Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, March 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02398.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Hus, Amanda Taylor, Catherine Lord

Abstract

Delays in development are a fundamental feature in diagnosing autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Age of language acquisition, usually obtained through retrospective caregiver report, is currently used to distinguish between categories within ASD. Research has shown that caregivers often report children as having acquired developmental milestones earlier or later than they were actually achieved. The current study examines the extent to which this phenomenon, referred to as 'telescoping,' impacts retrospective reports provided by caregivers of children with ASD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Master 15 13%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 34 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,456,203
of 34,357,314 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry
#1,189
of 3,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,957
of 160,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,357,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.