↓ Skip to main content

Is the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist a useful tool for monitoring progress in children with autism spectrum disorders?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Is the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist a useful tool for monitoring progress in children with autism spectrum disorders?
Published in
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, January 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01359.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There are few well validated brief measures that can be used to assess the general progress of young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) over time. In the present study, the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) was used as part of a comprehensive assessment battery to monitor the progress of 22 school-aged children with ASD who had previously taken part in intensive home- or school-based intervention programmes in their pre-school years.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 219 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 68 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 16%
Social Sciences 19 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 76 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,786,063
of 28,840,878 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#214
of 1,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,583
of 209,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,840,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.