You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The tragic paradoxical effect of telemedicine on healthcare disparities- a time for redemption: a narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-023-02194-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Motti Haimi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 15% |
| United States | 7 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 50% |
| Scientists | 18 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 40 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 13 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#801,490
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#19
of 2,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,954
of 395,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.