You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Temporary wetlands: challenges and solutions to conserving a ‘disappearing’ ecosystem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.024 |
| Authors |
Aram J.K. Calhoun, David M. Mushet, Kathleen P. Bell, Dani Boix, James A. Fitzsimons, Francis Isselin-Nondedeu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 14% |
| Researcher | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 68 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 81 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 24% |
| Engineering | 12 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 85 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,790,005
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,553
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,571
of 330,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#66
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.