↓ Skip to main content

Integrating kelp genomic analyses and geological data to reveal ancient earthquake impacts

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Royal Society Interface, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
18 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Integrating kelp genomic analyses and geological data to reveal ancient earthquake impacts
Published in
Journal of The Royal Society Interface, May 2023
DOI 10.1098/rsif.2023.0105
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Detached buoyant kelp can disperse thousands of kilometres at sea and can colonize newly available shores in the wake of disturbances that wipe out competitors. Localized earthquake uplift can cause extirpation of intertidal kelp populations followed by recolonization. Sources of recolonizing kelp can be detectable in genomic structure of contemporary populations. Our field observations combined with LiDAR mapping identified a previously unrecognized zone of uplifted rocky coastline in a region that is slowly subsiding. Intertidal kelp (Durvillaea antarctica) on the uplifted section of coast is genetically distinctive from nearby populations, with genomic signatures most similar to that of kelp 300 km to the south. Genetic divergence between these locations suggests reproductive isolation for thousands of years. Combined geological and genetic data suggest that this uplift event occurred during one of four major earthquakes between 6000 and 2000 years ago, with one of the younger events most likely. Extirpation of the pre-existing kelp required sudden uplift of approximately 2 metres, precluding several small incremental uplift events. Our results show the power of integrating biological (genomic) analyses with geological data to understand ancient geological processes and their ecological impacts.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Design 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#646,003
of 34,387,656 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#277
of 3,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,511
of 422,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,387,656 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.