You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
KIDS SAVE LIVES: Basic Life Support Education for Schoolchildren: A Narrative Review and Scientific Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Circulation, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.1161/cir.0000000000001128 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel C. Schroeder, Federico Semeraro, Robert Greif, Janet Bray, Peter Morley, Michael Parr, Naomi Kondo Nakagawa, Taku Iwami, Simon-Richard Finke, Carolina Malta Hansen, Andrew Lockey, Marina Del Rios, Farhan Bhanji, Comilla Sasson, Stephen M. Schexnayder, Tommaso Scquizzato, Wolfgang A. Wetsch, Bernd W. Böttiger, on behalf of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 128 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 11% |
United States | 10 | 8% |
Australia | 7 | 5% |
Canada | 6 | 5% |
Italy | 3 | 2% |
Spain | 3 | 2% |
India | 3 | 2% |
Nigeria | 2 | 2% |
Japan | 2 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 16% |
Unknown | 57 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 85 | 66% |
Scientists | 20 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 11 | 20% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 27 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 11 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 27 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 846. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#21,850
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#88
of 21,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#630
of 394,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#3
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.