You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to assess tissue oxygenation?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Opinion in Critical Care, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1097/mcc.0000000000001046 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel De Backer, Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 18 | 16% |
| Ecuador | 10 | 9% |
| Colombia | 6 | 5% |
| Argentina | 4 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 3% |
| Peru | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Paraguay | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 103 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 50% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#695,449
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Critical Care
#28
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,224
of 422,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Critical Care
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.