You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The expendables: Bioarchaeological evidence for pauper apprentices in 19th century England and the health consequences of child labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0284970 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca L. Gowland, Anwen C. Caffell, Leslie Quade, Alysa Levene, Andrew R. Millard, Malin Holst, Poppy Yapp, S. Delaney, Chloe Brown, Geoff Nowell, Colin McPherson, Heidi A. Shaw, Nicolas A. Stewart, Sally Robinson, Janet Montgomery, Michelle M. Alexander |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 20% |
| Australia | 4 | 9% |
| Brazil | 3 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 76% |
| Scientists | 8 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 32% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 9 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1565. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,297
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#84
of 222,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220
of 392,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4
of 5,564 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,564 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.