↓ Skip to main content

Placental transport of immunoglobulin G

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
patent
13 patents
reddit
2 Redditors
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
436 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Placental transport of immunoglobulin G
Published in
Vaccine, July 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00334-7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Maternal antibodies transported across the placenta protect the newborn. Maternal immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations in fetal blood increase from early in the second trimester through term, most antibodies being acquired during the third trimester. IgG1 is the most efficiently transported subclass and IgG2 the least. Transfer across the syncytiotrophoblast of the chorionic villi is mediated by the neonatal Fc receptor, FcRn. Immune complexes are absorbed in the stroma of the villi, probably by FcgammaRI, FcgammaRII, and FcgammaRIII on placental macrophages. The mechanism of IgG transport across the endothelium of fetal capillaries is not understood. Endothelial cells in terminal villi express FcgammaRIIb. However, it is not known whether this receptor transports IgG or prevents transport of immune complexes to the fetus.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 424 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 17%
Researcher 70 16%
Student > Master 54 12%
Student > Bachelor 41 9%
Other 30 7%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 107 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 41 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 3%
Other 38 9%
Unknown 114 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,372,622
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#1,238
of 19,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,529
of 75,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#5
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.