You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Osteohistological characterization and ontogeny of Caiuajara dobruskii (Pterosauria, Pterodactyloidea, Tapejaridae)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Historical Biology, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.1080/08912963.2023.2207193 |
Authors |
Esaú Victor de Araújo, Renan Alfredo Machado Bantim, Borja Holgado, Juliana Manso Sayão, Luiz Carlos Weinschütz, Alexander Kellner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#982,648
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Historical Biology
#102
of 1,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,340
of 392,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Biology
#6
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.