You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Diagnostic Criteria for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.03.036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noah D. Silverberg, Grant L. Iverson, ACRM Brain Injury Special Interest Group Mild TBI Task Force members:, Alison Cogan, Kristen Dams-O-Connor, Richard Delmonico, Min Jeong P. Graf, Mary Alexis Iaccarino, Maria Kajankova, Joshua Kamins, Karen L. McCulloch, Gary McKinney, Drew Nagele, William J. Panenka, Amanda R. Rabinowitz, Nick Reed, Jennifer V. Wethe, Victoria Whitehair, ACRM Mild TBI Diagnostic Criteria Expert Consensus Group:, Vicki Anderson, David B. Arciniegas, Mark T. Bayley, Jeffery J. Bazarian, Kathleen R. Bell, Steven P. Broglio, David Cifu, Gavin A. Davis, Jiri Dvorak, Ruben J. Echemendia, Gerard A. Gioia, Christopher C. Giza, Sidney R. Hinds, Douglas I. Katz, Brad G. Kurowski, John J. Leddy, Natalie Le Sage, Angela Lumba-Brown, Andrew IR. Maas, Geoffrey T. Manley, Michael McCrea, David K. Menon, Jennie Ponsford, Margot Putukian, Stacy J. Suskauer, Joukje van der Naalt, William C. Walker, Keith Owen Yeates, Ross Zafonte, Nathan D. Zasler, Roger Zemek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 54 | 38% |
| Canada | 11 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 7% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 87 | 61% |
| Scientists | 35 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 265. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#139,553
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#10
of 6,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,346
of 393,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#1
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.