↓ Skip to main content

The good, the bad, and the statutory: are statutory or non-statutory natural resource management plans higher in quality?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The good, the bad, and the statutory: are statutory or non-statutory natural resource management plans higher in quality?
Published in
Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, December 2016
DOI 10.1080/1523908x.2016.1265885
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Master 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Unspecified 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 31%
Social Sciences 4 25%
Unspecified 2 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2017.
All research outputs
#24,388,923
of 33,973,571 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning
#480
of 698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314,877
of 458,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,973,571 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.