You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heart Rhythm, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1538 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mina K Chung, Kristen K Patton, Chu-Pak Lau, Alexander R J Dal Forno, Sana M Al-Khatib, Vanita Arora, Ulrika Maria Birgersdotter-Green, Yong-Mei Cha, Eugene H Chung, Edmond M Cronin, Anne B Curtis, Iwona Cygankiewicz, Gopi Dandamudi, Anne M Dubin, Douglas P Ensch, Taya V Glotzer, Michael R Gold, Zachary D Goldberger, Rakesh Gopinathannair, Eiran Z Gorodeski, Alejandra Gutierrez, Juan C Guzman, Weijian Huang, Peter B Imrey, Julia H Indik, Saima Karim, Peter P Karpawich, Yaariv Khaykin, Erich L Kiehl, Jordana Kron, Valentina Kutyifa, Mark S Link, Joseph E Marine, Wilfried Mullens, Seung-Jung Park, Ratika Parkash, Manuel F Patete, Rajeev Kumar Pathak, Carlos A Perona, John Rickard, Mark H Schoenfeld, Swee-Chong Seow, Win-Kuang Shen, Morio Shoda, Jagmeet P Singh, David J Slotwiner, Arun Raghav M Sridhar, Uma N Srivatsa, Eric C Stecker, Tanyanan Tanawuttiwat, W H Wilson Tang, Carlos Andres Tapias, Cynthia M Tracy, Gaurav A Upadhyay, Niraj Varma, Kevin Vernooy, Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman, Sarah Ann Worsnick, Wojciech Zareba, Emily P Zeitler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 161 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 24% |
| Turkey | 8 | 5% |
| Spain | 7 | 4% |
| Colombia | 7 | 4% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Argentina | 4 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Poland | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 21% |
| Unknown | 49 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 111 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 16% |
| Scientists | 18 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 46% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 205. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#194,468
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Heart Rhythm
#30
of 4,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,565
of 391,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Rhythm
#5
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.