↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Early Hemodynamic Screening on Extremely Preterm Outcomes in a High-Performance Center.

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact of Early Hemodynamic Screening on Extremely Preterm Outcomes in a High-Performance Center.
Published in
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, August 2023
DOI 10.1164/rccm.202212-2291oc
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Increasing survival of extremely preterm infants with a stable rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage represents a growing health risk for neonates. To evaluate the role of early hemodynamic screening on the risk of death/severe intraventricular hemorrhage. All eligible patients 22-26+6 weeks gestation born/admitted <24h postnatal age were included. As compared to standard neonatal care for controls (01/2010-12/2017), patients admitted in the second epoch (10/2018-04-2022) were exposed to hemodynamic screening (HS) using targeted neonatal echocardiography at 12-18h. A primary composite outcome of death/severe intraventricular hemorrhage was decided a priori using a 10% reduction in baseline rate to calculate sample size. A total of n=423 controls and n=191 screening patients were recruited with a mean gestation and birthweight of 24.71.5 weeks and 699191 grams respectively; infants born at 22-23 weeks represented 44% (n=84) of the HS epoch vs 32% (n=135) of the controls (p=0.004). Increase in perinatal optimization (e.g., antepartum steroids) but with a decline in maternal health (e.g., increased obesity) were seen in HS vs control epoch. A reduction in the primary outcome, and each of severe intraventricular hemorrhage, death, death in the first postnatal week, necrotizing enterocolitis, and severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia were seen in the screening era. After adjustment for perinatal confounders and time, screening was independently associated with survival free of severe intraventricular hemorrhage with an odds ratio of 2.09 [1.19, 3.66]. Early hemodynamic screening and physiology-guided care may be an avenue to further improve neonatal outcomes; further evaluation is warranted.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 12%
Librarian 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 19 56%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 21 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2025.
All research outputs
#4,234,229
of 34,387,656 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#4,037
of 15,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,933
of 389,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#51
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,387,656 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.