↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Phase Separation Structures between Undercooled Cu–Fe and Cu–Co Alloys Solidified Under a Static Magnetic Field

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Phase Separation Structures between Undercooled Cu–Fe and Cu–Co Alloys Solidified Under a Static Magnetic Field
Published in
Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, May 2023
DOI 10.1080/00219592.2023.2211117
Authors

Taiki Okuyama, Rikuto Suzuki, Masaki Kubo, Takao Tsukada, Eita Shoji, Hiroyuki Fukuyama

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#15,501,594
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan
#307
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,969
of 201,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them