↓ Skip to main content

Cell surface hydrophobicity and mycolic acid composition of Rhodococcus strains isolated from activated sludge foam

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cell surface hydrophobicity and mycolic acid composition of Rhodococcus strains isolated from activated sludge foam
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, May 2002
DOI 10.1038/sj/jim/7000241
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The bacteria causing foaming in activated sludge plants are considered to be hydrophobic, and their hydrophobicity is assumed to be a crucial factor in their foam-forming ability. This study showed no consistent relationship between cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH), as determined by microbial adherence to hydrocarbons, of three Rhodococcus spp. isolated from activated sludge foam and their ability to produce a stable foam. There also appeared to be no correlation between the mycolic acid composition of these strains, in terms of chain length or degree of unsaturation, and either CSH or foaming ability. Zeolite and bentonite successfully prevented foaming by a Rhodococcus sp. in pure culture, which suggests that cell surface charge may also play a role in foam stabilisation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 26%
Environmental Science 4 11%
Engineering 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#12,345,171
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#1,016
of 2,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,366
of 177,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.