↓ Skip to main content

Improving programme‐led and focused interventions for eating disorders: An experts' consensus statement—A UK perspective

Overview of attention for article published in European Eating Disorders Review, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving programme‐led and focused interventions for eating disorders: An experts' consensus statement—A UK perspective
Published in
European Eating Disorders Review, May 2023
DOI 10.1002/erv.2981
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Davey, Karina Allen, Sophie D. Bennett, Rachel Bryant‐Waugh, Tim Clarke, Zafra Cooper, Katharina Dixon‐Ward, Jake Dudley, Ivan Eisler, Jess Griffiths, Andrew J. Hill, Nadia Micali, Rebecca Murphy, Ivana Picek, Ros Rea, Ulrike Schmidt, Mima Simic, Kate Tchanturia, Gemma Traviss‐Turner, Janet Treasure, Hannah Turner, Tracey Wade, Glenn Waller, Roz Shafran

Abstract

Eating disorders are associated with significant illness burden and costs, yet access to evidence-based care is limited. Greater use of programme-led and focused interventions that are less resource-intensive might be part of the solution to this demand-capacity mismatch. In October 2022, a group of predominantly UK-based clinical and academic researchers, charity representatives and people with lived experience convened to consider ways to improve access to, and efficacy of, programme-led and focused interventions for eating disorders in an attempt to bridge the demand-capacity gap. Several key recommendations were made across areas of research, policy, and practice. Of particular importance is the view that programme-led and focused interventions are suitable for a range of different eating disorder presentations across all ages, providing medical and psychiatric risk are closely monitored. The terminology used for these interventions should be carefully considered, so as not to imply that the treatment is suboptimal. Programme-led and focused interventions are a viable option to close the demand-capacity gap for eating disorder treatment and are particularly needed for children and young people. Work is urgently needed across sectors to evaluate and implement such interventions as a clinical and research priority.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 10 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,591,325
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from European Eating Disorders Review
#65
of 960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,213
of 390,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Eating Disorders Review
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.