↓ Skip to main content

Risk Preferences in Strategic Wildfire Decision Making: A Choice Experiment with U.S. Wildfire Managers

Overview of attention for article published in Risk Analysis: An International Journal, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Risk Preferences in Strategic Wildfire Decision Making: A Choice Experiment with U.S. Wildfire Managers
Published in
Risk Analysis: An International Journal, October 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01894.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Master 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 33 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 11%
Environmental Science 10 9%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 40 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,093,442
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Risk Analysis: An International Journal
#910
of 2,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,241
of 231,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Analysis: An International Journal
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.