↓ Skip to main content

Adult Infratentorial Pial Arteriovenous Fistula Treated with Detachable Coils: A Case Report and a Review of Literature

Overview of attention for article published in NMC Case Report Journal, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adult Infratentorial Pial Arteriovenous Fistula Treated with Detachable Coils: A Case Report and a Review of Literature
Published in
NMC Case Report Journal, May 2023
DOI 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0391
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoya Kidani, Yusuke Inoue, Shohei Nishigaki, Juntaro Fujita, Yuta Sotome, Yusuke Tomita, Kenichiro Muraoka, Nobuyuki Hirotsune, Shigeki Nishino

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from NMC Case Report Journal
#55
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,429
of 390,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NMC Case Report Journal
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.