↓ Skip to main content

Satisfaction of Search in Diagnostic Radiology

Overview of attention for article published in Investigative Radiology, February 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Satisfaction of Search in Diagnostic Radiology
Published in
Investigative Radiology, February 1990
DOI 10.1097/00004424-199002000-00006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A subset of underreading errors (false-negative responses) in radiology has been attributed to "satisfaction of search," which occurs when lesions remain undetected after detection of an initial lesion. This phenomenon has not been studied in the experimental laboratory. A primary goal of this study was to develop a procedure or paradigm to study satisfaction of search. The authors measured detection accuracy for native lesions in images before and after the addition of a simulated nodular lesion. Simulated and native lesions were not spatially superimposed and the native abnormalities were physically identical with and without the nodules. Only responses related to the native lesion were analyzed. Accuracy parameters of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were estimated by the method of maximum likelihood and jackknife. The average perceptual accuracy of the individual ROC curves as measured by Az and de' was significantly reduced with addition of the nodules (t = 2.364, p = 0.025, t = 2.648, p = 0.017, respectively). Az and de' parameters of the pooled ROC curve showed a similar effect (t = 1.573, p = 0.080; t = 1.934, p = 0.047, respectively). The results indicated a substantial satisfaction-of-search effect, with diminished accuracy in perception of native lesions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 21%
Psychology 17 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,952,879
of 28,829,220 outputs
Outputs from Investigative Radiology
#154
of 2,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,538
of 64,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigative Radiology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,829,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.