↓ Skip to main content

Peat and disinfectant powder used in swine husbandry systems – quantification of oral intake using toxic metals as potential markers

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Animal Nutrition, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peat and disinfectant powder used in swine husbandry systems – quantification of oral intake using toxic metals as potential markers
Published in
Archives of Animal Nutrition, May 2023
DOI 10.1080/1745039x.2023.2175537
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felicitas Koch, Janine Kowalczyk, Hans Mielke, Hans Schenkel, Roman Schmidt, Alexander Roloff, Martin Bachmann, Annette Zeyner, Robert Pieper

Abstract

The use of enrichment and bedding materials in pig husbandry intends to comply with the animals' behavioural needs to perform natural exploratory behaviour, which is strongly connected to foraging behaviour. It can thus be assumed that pigs will ingest a certain material quantity possibly posing a risk to animal health and food safety as previous studies identified contaminants in enrichment and bedding materials. However, risk assessment requires knowledge about the effective amount of ingested material. Voluntary material intake of pigs with free access to peat and disinfectant powder was estimated by measuring the tissue levels of toxic metals originating from the respective materials in 28 pigs (seven groups, n = 4) via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and comparing the results to tissue levels of pigs fed with known amounts of metals. Additionally, as markers of consumption, n-alkanes and acid insoluble ash naturally occurring in the materials and titanium dioxide, added as an external marker to disinfectant powder, were analysed in pigs' faeces. Tissue levels of toxic metals as well as marker analyses in pigs' faeces could prove material consumption. Results revealed mean voluntary intake levels of peat and disinfectant powder by pigs up to 7% and 2% of the daily ration. Hence, a transfer of contained toxic metals into the food chain might occur. Although current maximum levels for toxic elements in animal tissues were not exceeded due to dietary inclusion of peat or disinfectant powder, dietary exposure through food of animal origin should be reduced to a possible minimum. This applies specifically for elements, where no health-based guidance values for humans could have been derived (e.g. arsenic). Thus, labelling guidelines for enrichment and bedding materials can be a perspective to limit the entry of toxic metals and trace elements into the environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#19,246,640
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Animal Nutrition
#109
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,010
of 197,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Animal Nutrition
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.