You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fire in the bog: responses of peatland vegetation in the Australian Alps to fire
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australian Journal of Botany, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1071/bt22072 |
| Authors |
Keith L. McDougall, Jennie Whinam, Fiona Coates, John W. Morgan, Neville G. Walsh, Genevieve T. Wright, Geoff S. Hope |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 10% |
| Psychology | 1 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,899,719
of 23,942,830 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Botany
#136
of 592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,547
of 388,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Botany
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,942,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them