You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical trial of a probiotic and herbal supplement for lung health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1168582 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nancy M. Wenger, Luhua Qiao, Teodora Nicola, Zoha Nizami, Isaac Martin, Brian A. Halloran, Kosuke Tanaka, Michael Evans, Xin Xu, Timothy G. Dinan, Charles Kakilla, Gillian DunnGalvin, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Kent A. Willis, Amit Gaggar, Charitharth Vivek Lal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 24% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 562. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#42,672
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#28
of 6,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,107
of 382,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.