↓ Skip to main content

19世紀後半米国の女性医師M. P. ジャコービーの「栄養論」とフェミニズム ―「月経」と「貧血」の解釈を中心に

Overview of attention for article published in Women's Studies, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
19世紀後半米国の女性医師M. P. ジャコービーの「栄養論」とフェミニズム ―「月経」と「貧血」の解釈を中心に
Published in
Women's Studies, November 2021
DOI 10.50962/wsj.20.0_77
Authors

横山 美和

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Women's Studies
#13
of 49 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,538
of 520,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Women's Studies
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one scored the same or higher as 36 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.